Does Google consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles?
-
Moz has been flagging a lot of our articles for duplicate titles. I noticed that the website was automatically generating the same words that were used for the titles above the articles and main images. But those are bread crumbs. Does anyone know if Google also considers those duplicate titles?
I'm not sure if the screenshot I'm uploading will appear, but this is one of the blog posts the extra wording was showing up on: https://hometowneautorepairandtireofwoodbridge.com/blog/when-why-replace-spark-plugs/
-
No, Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are typically used in website navigation to show the hierarchical structure of a website and help users understand their current location within the site. They are usually displayed near the top of a webpage and provide a clear path back to previous pages or categories.
Duplicate titles, on the other hand, refer to instances where multiple pages on a website have the same or very similar title tags. Duplicate titles can confuse search engines and make it challenging to determine the relevance and uniqueness of each page.
Google encourages webmasters to create unique and descriptive title tags for each page to improve the overall user experience and SEO performance. Breadcrumbs and title tags serve different purposes, and there is no inherent conflict between them in terms of SEO. It's important to use both effectively to enhance the usability and search engine optimization of your website.
-
Implementing breadcrumbs is a pretty straight forward way to improve a site's SEO and provide better UX. However, there are some times when implementing breadcrumbs could cause more harm than good. Here are a few breadcrumb mistakes you'll want to avoid
-
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, Google generally does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are a navigational aid on websites that show users their path from the homepage to the current page. They are typically displayed as a series of clickable links separated by arrows. Breadcrumb links are meant to provide a clear and hierarchical structure of the website's content, helping users navigate easily.
Project Manager Salary
Google's algorithms aim to understand the content and structure of web pages. While it's essential to have unique and descriptive titles for each page to improve SEO and user experience, breadcrumbs are typically not considered part of the main content or title tag.However, it's crucial to ensure that your website's breadcrumb implementation is done correctly and does not generate duplicate content issues. To avoid any potential problems, you should:
Use proper HTML markup for breadcrumbs.
Ensure that breadcrumb links accurately represent the hierarchical structure of your website.
Avoid using the same anchor text in breadcrumbs and page titles if it doesn't make sense in the context.
Keep in mind that Google's algorithms and guidelines may evolve over time, so it's a good practice to stay updated with the latest SEO best practices and guidelines provided by Google or other search engines. -
No, Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are a navigational aid on a website that helps users understand their current location within the site's hierarchy. They are typically displayed near the top of a webpage and show the path a user has taken to reach the current page.
Atlantic Immigration Pilot program application formBreadcrumbs serve a different purpose than page titles. Page titles are meant to provide a concise and descriptive title for a specific webpage, while breadcrumbs are designed to show the user's path through the website's structure. Google's search algorithms understand the distinction between these elements and do not treat breadcrumbs as duplicate titles.
However, it's important to ensure that both your page titles and breadcrumbs accurately represent the content and hierarchy of your website. Clear and descriptive titles and breadcrumbs can improve user experience and help search engines understand the context of your pages, potentially benefiting your website's search visibility. ( best digital marketing agency )
-
In my experience, Google generally does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. In fact, breadcrumbs can enhance user experience by providing clear pathways to different sections of your site. They offer context and help users easily navigate to their desired destination within the site's hierarchy.
However, it's essential to ensure that the titles used in your breadcrumbs are descriptive, unique, and relevant to the content they represent. This practice not only avoids confusion for users but also aligns with SEO best practices. I did for my subpages because there are not linked with the main product page.
-
Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are navigational links typically displayed on a website to show the user's path from the homepage to the current page. They usually appear near the top of the page, often just below the header or menu.
Breadcrumbs are helpful for users to understand their current location within the site's hierarchy and easily navigate back to previous pages. They are also useful for search engines to understand the structure of your website and improve its overall crawl ability and indexability.
See the following website using the breadcrumbs.
https://trackstatus.in/Duplicate titles, on the other hand, refer to multiple pages on a website having the same or very similar page titles. Having duplicate titles can potentially lead to confusion for both users and search engines, as they might not be able to distinguish between the pages.
-
Read the full blog here: https://www.inbound.blog/breadcrumbs-seo/. Here you can find the complete information about breadcrumbs in SEO.
-
Are these bread crumbs? I'm confused
-
Bump. I would also like to know the answer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Keywords No Data
I was searching keywords for my new blog post and suddenly Moz stopped showing KD of keywords.
Keyword Explorer | | erozgaar50 -
English pages given preference over local language
We recently launched a new design of our website and for SEO purposes we decided to have our website both in English and in Dutch. However, when I look at the rankings in MOZ for many of our keywords, it seems the English pages are being preferred over the Dutch ones. That never used to be the case when we had our website in the old design. It mainly is for pages that have an English keyword attached to them, but even then the Dutch page would just rank. I'm trying to figure out why English pages are being preferred now and whether that could actually damage our rankings, as search engines would prefer copy in the local language. An example is this page: https://www.bluebillywig.com/nl/html5-video-player/ for the keywords "HTML5 player" and "HTML5 video player".
Local SEO | | Billywig0 -
Correcting errors in Knowledge Panel and Answer box.
My organization is lucky enough to have a knowledge panel associated with our brand search: IEEE
Research & Trends | | SledDawg
And, I "own" the panel e.g. Google knows that I am associated with the brand and multiple web properties related to it. (IEEE has many hundreds of related websites, and the domain ieee.org is one of the oldest on the internet.) However, Google consistently displays incorrect information in the panel.
I have spent much time "suggesting edits" for these data points, with some success over time. But, there are some things that they just won't fix. If you do that search for "ieee" you can see in the panel the Executives datapoint. The two individuals listed there are not executives of the IEEE organization. (IEEE is a professional membership organization with over 400K members around the world.) Those two guys are in fact members of IEEE, but they are not associated with the central organization. The actual principals are listed on the Wikipedia page that Google is using to populate other data points since it is a "trusted source": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Electrical_and_Electronics_Engineers
Despite my contacting Google over and over with the correct data, and proffering references to multiple pages that contain that data, including our own organizational pages: https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/leadership.html
the Google team the "owns" the Knowledge Panels tells me: "We’ve reviewed your feedback, and unfortunately, the change you want to make to Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers isn’t supported at the moment. There are parts of Google Search that can’t be edited or removed, such as content that is found on publicly available websites, unless that information is inaccurate." I had a couple of messages from actual signed individuals on that team telling me that they could not make such a change, because, in effect, the algorithm was populating the Panel and it was out of their control.
This seems crazy to me. They are letting incorrect info stand for months at a time, despite a "trusted source" at the organization in question providing the correct data.
I have had similar experiences with info in Answer Box sections of the SERP, for various other organization-related data points. This is becoming internally awkward, in that members and staff see this incorrect info and come to me to get it corrected. Not to mention that it harms the organization by misrepresenting it. Thoughts? Suggestions? Have others had success in effecting such corrections?0 -
Duplicate Blog Content
Hey Mozzers! I have a client who is a dentist, with multiple offices, and wants to use an identical blog post (including images, alt text, text, tags, everything pretty much) from one of his office's website on his other office's website to save time and mimic the success of the original content for his other office. Everything I've researched says this is a HUGE no-no, but I'd love to hear if anyone else has tried to do something like this and if they were successful in doing so (implementing rel=cannonical or 301?). Also, if he is the owner of both sites and they both receive low traffic will Google even notice? My biggest worry is that if I did post the content on his other site, identically, that it would dilute the visibility of the original post, which has and is continuing to surpass our organic search goals... The main goal though, is to drive traffic to BOTH sites via organic search using the same content. Would love to hear everyone's opinions if this is possible or unrealistic... Thanks! -D
Content Development | | Derrald0 -
I work on a uk decorating website with five of our own bloggers all of which reside on the home page of the website on their own separete blogging urls as sub domains - is this a good idea or would google not like this from an seo point of view?
Should blogs that are part of an overall content site be on separate sites and link in or is it ok to promote them as content on the home page of the site and take users off to their own url to view the site. Is this good practise for seo?
Content Development | | Pday0 -
Is this duplicate content?
I'm optimizing a Magento site and have a question regarding duplicate content. Currently, you can dig down to an individual product listings with URLs similar to this: (1) http://www.foo.com/category/sub-category/sub-sub-category/item.html However, we also have a "Top 50" area, with a link to the same page; however, the URL for that page is: (2) http://www.foo.com/item.html Both are dynamic, so a static page for (2) with different content is out of the question. I asked IT to have both (1) and (2) point to exactly the same page, within the same categor(ies), but they said I would have choose one or the other So, here are my questions: Will Google consider the pages to be duplicates of each other, and thus incur a penalty; If I were to choose one structure, which would be the "friendliest?" I've think I've come across questions similar to this in Q&A, but haven't been able to locate them; so, I'm sorry to be posting a "duplicate question." I've been busy writing completely different product descriptions, nice and deep and value-rich, for more than 300 items and categories and am only now starting to look at current SEO protocols; I'm hoping to ask Google for a site reevaluation in another 2 weeks or so. Thanks.
Content Development | | RScime250 -
301 Redirect & Duplicate Content
We currently have 16465 audiobook products presented at our Web store. 5411 of them are out-of-publication (OOP). Here's an example: Harry Potter Audiobook 2 : Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - J.K. Rowling - cassette audiobook Many of the 5411 OOP products are duplicates and triplicates of one title but were offered on a different medium (cassette, CD or MP3 CD) or were a different type (abridged, unabridged, dramatized). The description (story-line) is the same for all. Because we know once a page gets on the Internet, it can live there for years, we decided to keep OOP product pages at our Web store to: Let those who may have searched for the product and clicked on a link to an OOP product's page that it was no longer available. Invite them to explore our Web store. Let them know that although the product may not be available on cassette, CD or MP3 CD, that it might be available as a digital download. We know that Google does NOT like duplicate content from one site to another and even within the same site. If we redirect all the 5411 pages to one OOP page, will this eliminate this duplicate content issue? The OOP page would explain that the title they were looking for is no longer available but that it might be available as a digital download.
Content Development | | lbohen0